Note that you can make this decision to highlight specific studies after you have begun writing the discussion section. Percentages and degrees of freedom: The effect size observed in this trial is somewhat less than those seen in previous trials of CBT for young people with OCD mean effect size 1.
In fact, expertise with IM predicted lower scores on the comprehension test. This is especially important when describing the discovery of significant or unanticipated findings. Overall, the results of this study support the need for a large-scale randomized controlled trial.
Infringement of any ethical guidelines may result in disqualification of the project. It should not be written as a question. Your style should be brief, but not using note form. Other trials of CBT with young people have tended to concentrate on managing the anxiety or discomfort experienced when undertaking exposure and response prevention, e.
The report should have a thread of argument linking the prediction in the introduction to the content in the discussion.
If appropriate, refer the reader to a figure or table to help enhance the interpretation of the data [either within the text or as an appendix]. Thus, our diagnoses are tentative and additional research using more formal diagnostic assessments of PTSD and other psychiatric diagnoses may be warranted.
The Discussion section is sort of an odd beast because it is here where you speculate, but must avoid rambling, guessing, or making logical leaps beyond what is reasonably supported for your data.
Structure and Writing Style These are the general rules you should adopt when composing your discussion of the results: Obviously, you must refer to your results when discussing them, but focus on the interpretation of those results and their significance in relation to the research problem, not the data itself.
While the introduction starts generally and narrows down to the specific hypothesis, the discussion starts with the interpretation of the results, then moves outwards to contextualize these findings in the general field.
Department of English Writing Guide. Ask you supervisor for advice, but if in doubt, keep it simple, choose a memory experiment you don't get extra marks for originality. You will also be likely to write your paper according to APA style.
If there is prior research to indicate this, you need to explain why it was significant or unanticipated.
Write that Journal Article - in 7 days! The effect size observed in this trial is somewhat less than those seen in previous trials of CBT for young people with OCD mean effect size 1. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate].
The purpose of the introduction is to explain where your hypothesis comes from. These data are all the more encouraging in light of extant data, which suggests that attitudes toward mental health use are positively associated with actual service use e.
Importance of a Good Discussion The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because this is where you: If you feel compelled to speculate, do so in the form of describing possible implications or explaining possible impacts.
The results of the content analysis of this study did not support this finding As such, you should always approach the selection and interpretation of your findings introspectively and to think critically about the possibility of judgmental biases unintentionally entering into discussions about the significance of your work.
Writing a thesis statement is actually the easy part. This can be followed by any recommendations for further research. Problems to Avoid Do not waste time restating your results. However, keep in mind that too much use of the first person can actually distract the reader from the main points [i.
Bates College; Hess, Dean R. Identify any controls used, e. So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by the addition of this new data.
Acknowledge limitations, but only if they can explain the result obtained. Final year students often find it difficult to choose a suitable research topic for their psychology lab report, and usually attempt to make things more complicated than they need to be.
Make Suggestions for Further Research You may choose to conclude the discussion section by making suggestions for further research [this can be done in the overall conclusion of your paper]. While the introduction starts generally and narrows down to the specific hypothesis, the discussion starts with the interpretation of the results, then moves outwards to contextualize these findings in the general field.How To Write A Discussion Section Psychology Thesis SmartCockpit - Airline training guides, Aviation, Operations SMARTCOCKPIT; Our #1 goal, sinceis to offer the most extensive online aviation resource to worldwide professional pilots.
1 A quick guide to writing a psychology lab-report An overview of the various sections of a report These issues are all dealt with in the Discussion section. What about all the other bits - the Title, Abstract and References?
These have important but the "British Journal of Psychology" or the "Journal of Experimental Psychology. “Perceptions of the Difficulties of Postgraduate L2 Thesis Students Writing the Discussion Section.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (January ): ; Kretchmer, Paul.
Fourteen Steps to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. Indeed, every discussion should include a "humility" section that addresses the study's limitations, write Cone and Foster. But avoid beginning the discussion with a. Writing the Discussion The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.
So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by the addition of this new data. Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid.
Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate].
Annual Review of PsychologyDownload